stratman323
Dr. Stratster
relick - is to lick gain
Relicked would be past tense.
Relicked can be past & present tense, like so many words in English. It was relicked (past). Now it is relicked (present).
relick - is to lick gain
Relicked would be past tense.
The word reliced is not from the word lice but relicRelicked can be past & present tense, like so many words in English. It was relicked (past). Now it is relicked (present).
The word reliced is not from the word lice but relic
Relic
an object having interest by reason of its age or its association with the past:
a museum of historic relics
Nonetheless, relic becomes relicked when the word is describing the process. That's what English does - I don't make the rules, I just learned 'em.
You could be right. English was never my best subject honestly.Nonetheless, relic becomes relicked when the word is describing the process. That's what English does - I don't make the rules, I just learned 'em.
The main problem we have here is that "relic" does not appear in English dictionaries as a VERB. Only as a noun.You could be right. English was never my best subject honestly.
I just follow form, it seems the word everyone uses. Never really gave the much thought till today.
When I see relicked it seems like it's the past tense of licking something again so that doesn't make much sense to me
The main problem we have here is that "relic" does not appear in English dictionaries as a VERB. Only as a noun.
Relic is a thing, not an action. And that's all there is to it![]()
Totally agree!Yes I got that now.
But what a relick? To lick again
It can be used as a verb.
Neither word seems correct. Aging or distressing seems a bit more appropriate.
Reliced does appear to be the accepted verbTotally agree!
BTW, when I searched for "relicked" Google told me I was wrong and brought up a huge lot of references to "relicing", so like it or not, "reliced" is the accepted norm.
View attachment 602463
The main problem we have here is that "relic" does not appear in English dictionaries as a VERB. Only as a noun.
Relic is a thing, not an action. And that's all there is to it![]()
The main problem we have here is that "relic" does not appear in English dictionaries as a VERB. Only as a noun.
Relic is a thing, not an action. And that's all there is to it![]()
Haha. I was as surpised as anyone that all the Google results came up with "relicing" being the accepted spelling. I would have backed you 100% on the k thingCorrect. But when an English noun becomes a verb, certain changes take place. Other words teach us the rules to follow to avoid coming up with stupid words that don't make sense like relicing. Relicking is how the word is pronounced, there is no obvious reason whey the word should be spelled relicing when we all agree it's pronounced relicking.
Yes I did study English...
Maybe we should adopt "distressed" instead of adding insects to our guitars or licking them (once or several times!).
![]()
Haha. I was as surpised as anyone that all the Google results came up with "relicing" being the accepted spelling. I would have backed you 100% on the k thing![]()
Maybe we should adopt "distressed" instead of adding insects to our guitars or licking them (once or several times!).
![]()
When exactly did Google take over from the Oxford English Dictionary as the primary source of wisdom about the English language? I must have missed that memo....
I'd like to know too!Let me Google it.
If this has urned into a grammar debate, I want to join! Germans love their grammar, and when learning English at school, grammar is one of the most important aspects. In the past, I have taught children from the USA who were trying to learn German, so I tried to explain which German grammar to use by comparing certain tenses to their closest English counterparts- they didn't know any English grammar though, sadly![]()